Timely diagnosis of anatomical variants of the biliary tract in reducing the surgical risk of hepatobiliary complications

Authors

Keywords:

Iatrogenesis, surgical injuries, Biliary tract, Variants

Abstract

Introduction: biliary tract diseases represent a very common medical problem, often requiring emergency interventions, affecting approximately 10 % of the adult population and the prevalence increasing with age. Approximately 35 % of this population could be affected by complications and symptoms that could require a cholecystectomy. Objectives: describe the importance of timely diagnosis of anatomical variants of the biliary tract in reducing the surgical risk of hepatobiliary complications. Methods: A systematic review was carried out, with scientific articles published in the period 2016-2022, in PubMed, MedLine, Cochrane, Scielo databases. The PRISMA diagram was implemented as a tool, taking as inclusion criteria related to the anatomical variants of biliary treatment, full texts, with a predominance of 6 years of publication. Results: injuries to the bile ducts during surgery can lead to major complications, such as cholangitis, biliary cirrhosis, portal hypertension and death. Diagnosis by imaging and execution by experienced surgeons has managed to reduce the risk and morbidity associated with liver and bile duct surgeries. Conclusions: the development of diagnostic technologies and new surgical techniques has achieved a decrease in morbidity and incidence of complications in bile duct injuries. In general, bile duct cuts are produced due to ignorance of the anatomical variants of the biliary tree after cholecystectomy, both in open and laparoscopic surgery, and is linked to perceptual error and the surgeon's inexperience.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Naeem MQ, Ahmed MS, Hamid K, Shazlee MK, Qureshi F, Asad Ullah M. Prevalence of Different Hepatobiliary Tree Variants on Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in Patients Visiting a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital in Karachi. Cureus. [Internet] 2020 [citado 2023/3/2];12(12):e12329. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.12329

Renzulli M, Brocchi S, Marasco G, Spinelli D, Balacchi C, Barakat M, Pettinari I, Golfieri R. A New Quantitative Classification of the Extrahepatic Biliary Tract Related to Cystic Duct Implantation. J Gastrointest Surg. [Internet] 2021 [citado 2023/3/6];25(9):2268-2279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-020-04852-8.

Lubikowski J, Piotuch B, Stadnik A, Przedniczek M, Remiszewski P, Milkiewicz P, Silva MA, Wojcicki M. Difficult iatrogenic bile duct injuries following different types of upper abdominal surgery: report of three cases and review of literature. BMC Surg. [Internet] 2019 [citado 2023/3/6];19(1):162. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-019-0619-0

Dibarboure L, Braggio V, Fernández A. Complicaciones de la cirugía hepatobiliar: Valoración por Colangio RM. Rev. Imagenología. [Internet] 2011[citado 2023/3/26]; 14(2):13-18. Disponible en: https://www.webcir.org/revistavirtual/articulos/marzo12/uruguay/uru_ingles.pdf

Stewart L. Iatrogenic biliary injuries: identification, classification, and management. Surg Clin North Am. [Internet] 2014 [citado 2023/3/30];94(2):297-310. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2014.01.008.

Limaylla-Vega H, Vega-Gonzales E. Lesiones iatrogénicas de las vías biliares. Rev. gastroenterol. Perú [Internet]. 2017 [citado 2023/3/30] ; 37( 4 ): 350-356. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.pe/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1022-51292017000400010&lng=es.

Gürsoy-Çoruh A, Gülpınar B, Baş H, Erden A. Frequency of bile duct confluence variations in subjects with pancreas divisum: an analysis of MRCP findings. Diagn Interv Radiol. [Internet] 2018 [citado 2023/3/30];24(2):72-76. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.5152/dir.2018.17200.

Swain B, Sahoo RK, Sen KK, G MK, Parihar SS, Dubey R. Evaluation of intrahepatic and extrahepatic biliary tree anatomy and its variation by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in Odisha population: a retrospective study. Anat Cell Biol. [Internet] 2020 [citado 2023/3/30];53(1):8-14. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.5115/acb.19.177.

Ríos-Hernández N, Guerrero-Avendaño GML. Lesiones de la vía biliar más frecuentes caracterizadas por colangiografía percutánea. Experiencia en un año en el servicio de radiología intervencionista. Anales de Radiología México. [Internet] 2018 [citado 2023/4/8];17(1):46-52. Disponible en: https://www.medigraphic.com/cgi-bin/new/resumen.cgi?IDARTICULO=79746

Palaz Alı O, Ibis AC, Gurtekin B. Financial Aspects of Bile Duct Injuries. Med Sci Monit. [Internet] 2017 [citado 2023/4/8];23:5264-5270. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.12659/msm.907532.

Arand C, Baruah-Tridip D. A study of factors associated with bile duct injury in cholecystectomy operations. Rev MedPulse-International Med J. [Internet] 2015 [citado 2023/4/8];2(12): 863-866. Disponible en: https://www.medpulse.in/Article/Volume2Issue12/MedPulse_2_12_8.pdf

Serna JC, Patiño S, Buriticá M, Osorio E, Morales CH, Toro JP. Incidencia de lesión de vías biliares en un hospital universitario: análisis de más de 1.600 colecistectomías laparoscópicas. Rev. Colomb. Cir. [Internet] 2019 [citado 2023/4/8]; 34(1): 45-54. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.30944/20117582.97

Pesce A, Palmucci S, La Greca G, Puleo S. Iatrogenic bile duct injury: impact and management challenges. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. [Internet] 2019 [citado 2023/4/11] 6(12):121-128. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.2147/CEG.S169492.

Taghavi SA, Niknam R, Alavi SE, Ejtehadi F, Sivandzadeh GR, Eshraghian A. Anatomical Variations of the Biliary Tree Found with Endoscopic Retrograde Cholagiopancreatography in a Referral Center in Southern Iran. Middle East J Dig Dis. [Internet] 2017 [citado 2023/4/11];9(4):201-205. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.15171/mejdd.2017.74.

Cova J, Louis C. Variantes anatómicas de las vías biliares: diagnóstico por cpre y su relación con enfermedades biliares. Gen [Internet]. 2016 [citado 2023/4/11]; 70(1): 016-022. Disponible en: http://ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0016-35032016000100004&lng=es.

Pocay M, Davaus R, Forti N, González J. Lesiones iatrogénicas de la vía biliar principal, manejo terapéutico. Reporte de 5 casos representativos y revisión de la literatura. Rev Venez Cir. [Internet]. 2013 [citado 2023/4/11]; 66(4). Disponible en: https://docs.bvsalud.org/biblioref/2022/09/1392673/115-manuscrito-216-1-10-20200313.pdf

Martínez-Mier G, Luna-Ortiz H, Hernández-Herrera N, Zilli-Hernandez S, Lajud-Barquin F. Factores de riesgo asociados a las complicaciones y a la falla terapéutica en las reconstrucciones de lesiones de vía biliar secundarias a colecistectomía. Cir Cir. [Internet] 2018[citado 2023/4/23]; 86(6): 491-498. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.24875/CIRU.18000276.

Pesce A, Esposto L, Piccoli M, Roccasalva F. Anatomic variations of intrahepatic biliary system at magnetic resonance cholangio- pancreatography : a single-institution experience and a systematic review of the literature. EuroMediterranean Biomedical Journal. [Internet] 2020[citado 2023/5/14]; 15(36): 145-151. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.3269/1970-5492.2020.15.36

Tolino Mariano José, Tartaglione Ana Sofía, Sturletti Carlos Diego, García Mariana Ivon. Variedades Anatómicas del Árbol Biliar: Implicancia Quirúrgica. Int. J. Morphol. [Internet]. 2010 [citado 2023/5/27]; 28(4): 1235-1240. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022010000400039.

Salah M, Masmoudi W, Barka M, Chermiti W, Zaghouani H, Ghannouchi S. Anatomic variations of the extrahepatic biliary tree. A monocentric study and review of the literature. Rev Tunis Med. [Internet] 2021 [citado 2023/5/30]; 99(6): 652-661. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8795998/

Published

2024-02-13

How to Cite

1.
Torres-Yanez JA, Vaca-Sánchez DF, Villena-Cevallos HM. Timely diagnosis of anatomical variants of the biliary tract in reducing the surgical risk of hepatobiliary complications. Gac méd estud [Internet]. 2024 Feb. 13 [cited 2024 Dec. 27];5(1):e219. Available from: https://revgacetaestudiantil.sld.cu/index.php/gme/article/view/219

Issue

Section

Original articles

ARK

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
0
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
N/A
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
9%
33%
Days to publication 
0
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Academic society 
Gaceta Médica Estudiantil
Publisher 
Universidad de Ciencias Médicas de Guantánamo